NEW DELHI: The right to life of laboratory animals has become a point of contention between scientists and animal rights activists. Recent
guidelines issued by University Grants Commission (UGC) banning the
age-old practice of using lab animals for research has not gone down
well with scientists from Delhi University and Jawaharlal Nehru
University. Indian National Science Academy (INSA) has compiled a
report on the views of scientists and animal rights activists on the
matter. The report will be submitted to the ministry of environment and
forests (MOEF) next month.
Scientists feel a
complete ban on the usage of animals in labs and universities could have
a detrimental effect on students' understanding of the subject. K
Muralidhar, professor, department of zoology and hormone research
laboratory, DU, said that last July, the then environment minister Jairam Ramesh
had floated a draft bill on the use animals for teaching and research.
"The secret copies of the draft bill were circulated among various
ministries, including the health ministry. When we got to know about the
contents of the draft, we thought it would have serious repercussions
on life sciences courses, so we asked for a discussion," he said. A
discussion was organized by INSA in September 2011 where scientists,
doctors and activists from various institutions presented their views.
"We will release a compilation next month. The ministry should take a
decision after hearing all stakeholders," Muralidhar said. "I feel UGC's
guidelines are a result of misplaced emotions," he said.
Muralidhar, who claimed to be an animal lover himself, felt there was a
lot of room to reduce the use of animals in universities. "Animals have
to be used for teaching basic biology and are needed as models for
health research. However, they can be handled in a humane way and their
usage can be reduced. But students need to learn to handle animals at
least once, to get hands-on experience," he added.
While PETA activists have suggested computer simulations and mannequins
as alternatives for dissection, scientists say that nothing can replace
practical knowledge. A cancer biologist and professor at School of Life
Sciences (SLS), JNU Rana P Singh said, "Working with a live animal is
very different. At least, at the masters level students should be
exposed to the practice. When they go on to pursue M Phil or Phd, they
will have some idea of anatomy," he said.
Professor
of zoology and director of Delhi University (South Campus), Umesh Rai
seems to agree. "Research cannot be compromised. How can one experiment
without animals? Animals are needed even for chemical sciences research.
However, their usage can be minimized," Rai said.
Though scientists may have slammed the move, animal lovers have welcomed
it with open arms. "If universities in UK and US can do with out
animals, why not us? We held a number of demonstrations in medical
colleges and universities, including AIIMS on computer-aided learning
methods. These can be used by pharmacology and physiology students
easily. Research or experiments can be done through in-vitro methods
instead of in-vivo methods which require use of an animal. India is the
first country to issue such guidelines and we should be proud of it,"
said Science Policy Advisor, PETA India, Chaitanya Koduri. Peta has
submitted a dossier of alternative methods to the president of Medical
Council of India (MCI).
"The guidelines are very
progressive. We hope that similar rules are issued for toxicity testing
of drugs on animals. Alternatives like cell culture, use of human cells
and robotics can be used," said Alokparna Sengupta, coordinator, animal
experimentation campaign, Federation of Indian Animal Protection
Organizations (FIAPO).
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Scientists-take-on-activists-want-ban-on-live-testing-on-animals-lifted/articleshow/12896560.cms
No comments:
Post a Comment