HYDERABAD: Ever since the start of the academic year, a dreary corner of St Patricks School, Secunderabad
has turned into a popular kids' zone, especially among parents dropping
off their crying babies on their first day at school after it reopened
this year.
Keeping the children entertained were a pair of rose
ringed parakeets (parrots) in a small cage. The beautiful birds
distracted the young children even as those in the senior classes made
it a point to check out the birds in their free time.
But much
like the students even the school was unaware that it was committing an
offence. And on Friday, a team of anti poaching squad of the forest
department raided the school and seized the two birds.
They said the birds came under Schedule 4 of Wildlife Protection Act
1972 and keeping them caged was illegal. An attendant, who was gifted
the two birds by a parent, was slapped with a fine and booked under
Section 39 of the Act for keeping the wild birds in captivity.
The anti-poaching squad
landed at the school on Friday afternoon acting on a tip-off. Forest
department officials said that the parakeets were found in a small cage
near the gate of the school and one Subbaiah Pandian, an attendant was
looking after them.
While the school authorities feigned
ignorance about the matter, Subbaiah told the officials that a parent
had handed over the cage to him and he was keeping a check on it on the
school premises unaware of the Wildlife Act. Subbaiah, 40, was fined Rs
2,500 by the forest department.
Animal welfare activists said
that many schools were keeping birds in captivity and few principals
also said that when the birds die, they would even replace them.
"It is surprising that they are maintaining these birds. Schools are
not supposed to keep wild animals. Even if they want to keep domestic
animals and birds such rabbits, pigeons, ducks among others they have to
take permission from the Animal Welfare Board of India.
"Also,
they have to take all measures such as providing big cages, fresh water
and regular veterinary services. They have to keep animals in groups,"
said Mahesh Agarwal, member, AP State Animal Welfare Board.
According to Agarwal, in the last few years this is the third case
booked against a school for keeping wild birds in captivity. While two
other schools that were booked include Funskool School, Tarnaka and St
Marium Fun School located at Meerpet, Balapur. S P Naidu, principal of
Funskool, Tarnaka said that the school had kept
parrots
for 12 years until they were seized about two years ago. "We have a
play school and the birds were kept only to entertain the kids.
"Now we have pigeons, love birds, ducks, geese and a fish aquarium,"
said Naidu who was unaware of the Act and ended up paying Rs 15,000 as
penalty.
It was for the same reason that Manzoor Quader
Shahbaz, one of the directors of St Marium Fun School had kept a parrot.
Incidentally, even Shahbaz was unaware of the Act. But activists say
that ignorance is not an excuse.
A representative of Patrick
School, pleading anonymity, said that earlier the school had a large
collection of love birds and other domestic winged creatures. But this
pair of parrots did not belong to the school.
"Some parents
gave the two male parrots to the attendant and we did not know that it
came under Wildlife Act. For some kids school can be a tense and
fearsome place. For such children we had a collection of love birds and
some other birds. Some boys removed the mesh and 15-20 love birds flew
away some time back," he said.
Forest range officer V Tirumala
Rao said that denizens could intimate the department about any school
where this type of activity was going on and action would be initiated
against them.
During 2010, the anti poaching squad had booked 36 cases under the Wildlife Protection Act and 39 in 2011.
This financial year, so far 6 cases have been booked since April
against private individuals and establishments for keeping and eating
wild birds and animals.
Times View
Ignorance is not always a bliss and schools may have learnt their
lesson by now, at least as far as keeping wild animals on their premises
is concerned. But fining a poor man, who is lowest in the rung, for
being ignorant of the Wildlife Act is too harsh when a stern warning may
have been enough. Besides, the forest department should now look at
educating the educators, spread awareness among schools about the
Wildlife Act so that they take responsibility of such actions and not an
employee.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/Pet-parrots-land-school-attendant-in-the-soup/articleshow/14347301.cms